Forum: Allgemein

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Alex
Date: Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:30 PM
Subject: The Short Bicon Implants without complicated bone grafting and without ill, dead cow and sinus lifts
To: <Drallenci@gmail.com>

Dear Dr. Allen,

two days ago you mentioned at Facebook that Bicon is the best implant system. Last year I visited Dr. Vincent Morgan (CEO) of Bicon in Boston and we talked together. Also I tried to visit the second time Dr. Steiner in your near of Las Vegas, namely in Henderson.

Dr. Steiner found in cow bone "Bio-Oss" proteins. The Germans felt the court decisions that I have to go to jail although I am a heavy damaged patient and lost everything. With patient´s own blood or own bone you can reconstruct the jaw bone naturally.

What is your opinion about Bio-Oss and sinus lifts and screwed implants with micromovement?

Yours sincerely,

Alex

Allen Nazeri at Facebook: " Still the best implant system"

ALEX INSTRUMENTS LTD. 01/02/2013
Boston
USA

Higher Regional Court Cologne
Reichenspergerplatz 1
50570 Cologne

Dear Sir or Madam,

As already known the side effects of useless bovine bone grafting
material/ bovine bone filler "Bio-Oss" in dentistry are chronical
inflammations, pain, failure of the immune system and even cancer.

In the attachment you will find an excerpt of the drug telegram from
August 1999.

Here Hönig J. F. et al. informed, that remaining proteins from cows
are present in Bio-Oss.

The chemical government institute finds astonishingly after checking
through the BfArM no important protein residues, but at least proteins
residues from cows.

Against Hönig and other authors Geistlich Pharma AG (manufacturer of
Bio-Oss) proceeded allegedly legally.

The company “Geistlich Pharma AG” still reports that no protein
residues are in its products. This is unacceptable and misleading for
users and patients.

In a further attachment you receive the information that a Medical
Chief Doctor transplanted cow bone in patients with horrifying and
terrible side effects and damages. The chief doctor was consequently
convicted criminally.

Here I ask you that Bio-Oss must be proofed by the BfArM concerning proteins.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
Alex Schenker

P.S.

There are doctors who compare BioOss with the thalidomide affair.

"If the good god would have the will that you have dead cow or salt crystals in your bulb, he would have found a non-surgical way to do it.

Cow bone tastes great when one makes a soup from it. Any other use
I do not see on the dental field at present.

If ever a bone grafting should be necessary (and I have doubts that the lateral side region in the upper jaws counts usually to it), then you should rely on your patient´s own bone.

But Germany is a free country: Who wants to have dead cow, that will get it.
 

All The Best."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293798395_The_Risk_of_Prion_Infection_through_Bovine_Grafting_Materials

Dr. Hassan Nowzari from the USC in Los Angeles writes, that in cow bone "Bio-Oss" are bovine proteins and dentists should not use it. More than 300 Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease Cases exist due to cow bone "Bio-Oss".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creutzfeldt%E2%80%93Jakob_disease

LAWSUIT against Geistlich Pharma

ALEX INSTRUMENTS LTD.
- Plaintiff -

represented by the CEO Alex Schenker, Los Angeles, USA

against

Geistlich Biomaterials Distribution, Schneidweg 5, 76534 Baden-Baden, Germany respectively Geistlich Pharma AG, Bahnhofstr. 40, CH-6110 Wolhusen or Geistlich Pharma AG, D4 Business Center, D4 Platz 10, CH-6039 Root Längenbold, Switzerland

- Defendant -

provisional amount in dispute at least 4.999,99 Euros for claims of financial damages due to poor, erroneous and incorrectly declared medical devices from farm animals of the defendant (namely Bio-Gide from pigs and Bio-Oss from cows) for humans.

Bio-Oss is a so-called bone grafting material from cows in the human dentistry. In Bio-Oss are remaining bovine (cow) proteins such as prions that cause diseases in humans.

The plaintiff brings a legal action for financial damages by the defendant in relation to all previous material and immaterial damages caused by useless, pathogenic (disease -causing), carcinogenic (cancer -causing) Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide in the period from
 
01/10/2016 to 01/11/2016.

There exist doctors who compare Bio-Oss with the thalidomide affair.

Justification:

Born in Bielefeld on 03/09/1973 the plaintiff got on 06/06/2008 by the criminal dentist Steffen Schneider, Robert-Koch-Platz 11, in 10115 Berlin two dental implants in the left upper jaw in regio 25 and 26 which had to be removed surgically due to inflammation and pain on 10/23/2008.

Since 06/06/2008 the plaintiff was and is in permanent medical treatments with almost unbearable jaw pain, inflammation and other diseases.

Commonly known the criminal dentist Steffen Schneider damaged intentionally many patients like the plaintiff too. He has been already convicted several times at courts, does not receive any professional liability insurance in Germany and misused the title "Doctor" in Germany although he never wrote any dissertation.

Now Steffen Schneider has the function as a Medical Director and lecturer at an Austrian University for Dentistry in Vienna.

Unknowingly on 06/06/2008 the plaintiff was administered with the useless, disease-causing, misdeclared medical device "Bio-Oss" and falsely declared, possibly disease-causing medical device "Bio-Gide" by the defendant for a medical unnecessary bone grafting/bone building in the left upper jaw (medical term sinus lift or sinus floor elevation) simultaneously with the two implants .

The plaintiff has been damaged severely and incurably by the bone grafting material "Bio-Oss".

According to the letter on 07/03/2014 the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon and member of the German Drug Commission, PD Dr. Dr. Michael Stiller, Brahmsstr.11 in 14193 Berlin confirmed explicitly, that the plaintiff has a trigeminal neuralgia at the 2nd branche left because of "Bio-Oss", a chronical pain syndrome,  a Bio-Oss foreign body reaction and Bio-Oss inflammatory/immune response in the left upper jaw,  Bio-Oss scars left upper jaw, a bone defect left upper jaw, a chronical sinusitis, a persistent leukocytosis, TJM disorderes, a psychologically maldevelopment and depression.

Additionally it is written confirmed by Dr. Stiller that the plaintiff has a disability to work since 06/06/2008 and that the plaintiff was fired by his employer Paul Hartmann AG due to illness by a court desicion from 09/02/2011.

Evidence: Attachment K1

In so far the plaintiff maintained the deadline according to BGB (German civil law) for financial damages against the defendant, because Dr. Stiller confirmed him by writing the first time the "Bio-Oss diseases" as a medical doctor.

The pain that occur with a trigeminal neuralgia is among the strongest imaginable pain for humans.

On 08.08.2011 the plaintiff had to visit a doctor the first time concerning his "Bio-Oss-damage" and disability to work - caused by the defendand - for a medical opinion respectively report by his private health insurance HUK-COBURG (which canceled the plaintiff´s contract extraordinarely on 05/09/2014, although the plaintiff needs the health insurance for medical treatments!).

On 08/29/2011 the neurologist Peter W. Lust, Hohenzollerndamm 196 in 10717 Berlin confirmed written in his report that the plaintiff has certainly a nerve damage of his second trigeminal nerve. The reason is iatrogenic (caused by the criminal dentist Steffen Schneider) and bovine material.

In medicine the term "bovine" is known as origin of cow. This means in the case of the plaintiff's damage concretely "Bio-Oss" by the defendant.

In addition the neurologist Peter W. Lust continued in writing, that other causes of facial pain of the plaintiff are excluded.

Evidence: Attachment K2 (see page 5 with a sign of exclamation marked)

In a letter for the plaintiff - to hand out for the Ombudsman of Private Health Insurers - dated on 08/22/2012 the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon PD Dr. Dr. Frank Soost, Ilsenburger Str. 15 in 10589 Berlin (who wrote his habilitation thesis about bone grafting materials) and the ENT specialist Prof. Dr. Hans Behrbohm, Park Clinic Weissensee, Schönstr. 80 in 13086 Berlin confirmed that the plaintiff has a chronic inflammation of the left upper jaw and maxillary sinus and a trigeminal neuralgia due to a construction plastic.

The construction plastic was again cow bone "Bio-Oss". However, it was not mentioned specifically.

Evidence: Attachment K3 (see concretely with "X" marked)

In a writing for the Public German pension insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung) the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Dr. Soost reconfirmed on 09/14/2013, that the plaintiff is suffering with following diseases: symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia, chronic maxillary sinusitis (sinus inflammation), foreign body reaction jaw, specific phobia, chronic therapy-resistant facial pain, chronic inflammation of the maxillary sinus, dental alveoli and gums left, foreign body reaction (again Bio-Oss), chronic pain syndrome with accompanying psychologically misdevelopment, histological (here biological tissues are analyzed under the microscope) detection of foreign body reaction in the bone (again Bio-Oss) and left maxillary sinus etc.

Evidence: Attachment K4

The medical confirmed specific phobia of the plaintiff in the mentioned attachment K4 is based on the fact that the plaintiff received for many years more than 300 injections by syringes in his Bio-Oss infected and Bio-Oss inflamed jaw.

Can you imagine how painful it is to reveive from outside of the face injections into the trigeminal nerve?

In a letter by the neurologist Dr. Kretschmar, Greifswalder Str. 122 in 10409 Berlin he confirmed that the plaintiff has not performed the medical necessary painkilling injections anymore. In his remarks Dr. Kretschmar confirmed that further medical necessary injection treatments can be carried out only under general anesthesia.

Evidence: Attachment K5

In a letter dated on 01/27/2012 (court certified translation to German language was made by the plaintiff on 05/21/2012 by a translation agency with costs, invoice exists!) of the American bone grafting material manufacturer IMPLATEND LTD., Dr. Maurice Valen to the plaintiff he gave scientifical source citations that the (unresorbable or slow resorbable - > indissoluble or slow dissoluble) Bio-Oss particles can spread for example in the lungs and spleen or the lymph nodes in humans. The human organism tries to break down and dissolve the Bio-Oss particles, what is impossible.

Anytime the human immune system will give up.

White blood cells (leukocytes) are the first defense mechanism and leukocyte counts in the blood are increased by Bio-Oss of the defendant.

Evidence: Attachment K6

Since the administration of Bio-Oss the plaintiff has always too high white blood cells in blood counts, which are evidences of inflammatory/foreign body reaction by Bio-Oss of the defendant.

Evidence: Attachment K7

The plaintiff had several surgeries with his left upper jaw to remove the pathogenic "Bio-Oss"  - partially surgeries under general anesthesia with hospital stays  -  since the administered Bio-Oss by the defendant on 06/06/2008.

On 03/03/2009 there was a plaintiff surgery with a maxillary sinus revision (removal and cleaning of the left maxillary sinus) by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Dr. Soost in the Schlosspark Clinic Berlin.

Here some Bio-Oss has been removed from the sinus. The histological findings by the pathology Dr. Gaul and Switala confirmed a foreign body and inflammatory response and chronical sinusitis.

Evidence: Attachment K8

On 09/04/2013 was (as so often) a surgery again by Dr. Soost with the plaintiff. Here the plaintiff´s nerve fibers of the second trigeminal nerve  branche (facial nerve) were removed with further remaining Bio-Oss.

These plaintiff´s Bio-Oss biopsies were analysed by the pathologist Dr. Elfriede van Almsick, Potsdamer Str. 66 in Berlin with the result of existing inflammation with foreign body reaction and giant cells again.

Evidence: Attachment K9

The first time Dr. Stiller removed surgically most of the Bio-Oss on 19/23/2008 and the two implants. There exist photos of this surgery, where the scarred gum due to Bio-Oss can be seen etc.

The plaintiff can hand out the photos for the court as evidences, if necessary.

On 10/10/2013  the plaintiff had again a surgery by Dr. Stiller because of his Bio-Oss contaminated jaw. More Bio-Oss was removed.

These biopsies (also in that case there are photos as evidence) were analyzed by the Institute of Medical Diagnostics Berlin/Potsdam, concretely Dr. Volker von Baehr.

The medical result on 10/17/2013 shows a type IV immune response to the remaining Bio-Oss for the plaintiff. In a further letter from Dr. von Baehr on 10/17/2013 he confirmed that the plaintiff has a cellular immune response to the tested Bio-Oss.

Evidence: Attachment K10

A type IV immune response is medically a delayed allergy to Bio-Oss.

In another neurological report for the plaintiff by the Private Health Insurance HUK-COBURG is confirmed that the plaintiff has an allergy to bovine (cow) material.

The reason of the already medically proven Bio-Oss allergy are remaining proteins from cows. There is numerous scientific literature that in Bio-Oss are cow proteins.

Evidence: Attachment K11

The ENT Professor Dr. Hans Behrbohm (who performed a surgery for the plaintiff too) and Dr. Soost requested in their letter on 05/30/2013 that the Bio-Oss biopsies of the plaintiff should be examined because of bovine (cow) proteins.

In the letter from Dr. Stiller on 08/14/2013 he asked also for these medical necessary investigations.

Evidence: Attachment K12

The plaintiff could not win his financial claims for damages at the District Court Berlin and the next higher instance at the Superior Court Berlin against the responsible criminal Steffen Schneider respectively his liability insurance ZURICH AG.

Currently the Social Court Berlin demands the court documents (due to inexplicable reasons some documentation disappeared).

In these documentation are Bio-Oss biopsies from the plaintiff on 03/03/2009. Even the lawyer Sven Leistikow, Schaperstr. 14 in 10719 Berlin has this Bio-Oss biopsies.

Because of questionable GERMAN court decisions the plaintiff lost his apartment and all personal belongings of the past were destroyed.

Due to these very questionable GERMAN court decisions the plaintiff has no longer the Bio-Oss biopsies in paraffin, which the plaintiff let cut by pathologists and which the plaintiff sent to pathologists and dentists worldwide (for example to STEINER LABORATORIES or IMPLADENT LTD. in the USA, there were already found bovine (cow) proteins in Bio-Oss).

The plaintiff visited worldwide medical doctors and dentists because of his inflammation and excruciating pain caused by Bio-Oss (Australia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, India, UAE, Egypt, Kenya, Costa Rica, Brazil, Venezuela, Trinidad & Tobago, Dominican Republic, Mauritius, Seychelles, England, Austria, Israel, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Spain, France, Netherland, Turkey, Portugal, Poland, Iceland, Switzerland etc and the United States of America several times).

Some international medical doctors and people explained to the plaintiff that the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY treated and acted against the plaintiff like a victim at the time of National Socialism, because the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY destroyed the plaintiff´s life and hunted him because the GERMANS do not accept that the damage is caused by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider and the wrongly declared medical device "Bio-Oss".

The German legal system is unfair in the cases by the plaintiff and does not correspond to human dignity.

Since 06/06/2008 German medical doctors made several radiologic examinations, for example 20 Digital Volume Tomographies, diverse CT scans, PET CT-scans, bone szinitgraphics, diverse MRI and more than 200 X-rays.

By these radiological examinations the organism from the plaintiff has been damaged additionally.

The last Computer Tomography scan was performed at the University Clinic in Los Angeles (UCLA) on 08/18/2014. Here is the remaining Bio-Oss in the left paranasal and maxillary sinus, in the left upper jaw bone and in the soft tissue visible.

In the end of October 2014 the German University Clinic made again x-rays. Next to the tooth 27 Bio-Oss is visible what is infected.

Except of the USA the plaintiff will find no doctor who will remove the devil Bio-Oss surgically again.

On 09/05/2014 the German Private Health Insurance HUK-COBURG canceled the contract from the plaintiff extraordinarily, although the plaintiff needs urgently the benefits of a health insurance.

Dr. Stiller examined the CT scan from Los Angeles (UCLA) in October 2014 and also discovered the Bio-Oss.

There exist diverse Bio-Oss biopsies that were surgically removed out of the body from the plaintiff.

Due to medically written confirmations these biopsies must be proofed concerning bovine (cow) proteins / bovine (cow) organic residues.

Dr. Soost told the applicant that the Federal Criminal Police Office (BUNDESKRIMINALAMT) should make investigation for Bio-Oss.

Dr. Soost had already contact with the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) in the past, because he wrote a report due to silicone for facial treatments (cosmetic surgeries) with dire consequences for patients who have been damaged heavily by the leakage and spreading of silicone in the organism.

The plaintiff demands DNA analysis that all his Bio-Oss biopsies become examined due to remaining cow proteins (what must be proofed concerning the medical written statements by medical doctors). For this reason the plaintiff expected the judicial initiative by the court.

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by DNA analysis, if necessary by the Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt) -

The defendant mentioned in the patient information sheet falsely and being lying, that all organic components were removed in their wrongly declared medical device "Bio-Oss."

Evidence: Attachment K13 (see point a)

Due to the remaining organic cow residues in Bio-Oss it is the matter of statutory offence of fraud (cheat) and intentional injury in humans.

For this the prosecution must make investigations against the defendant.

Furthermore the defendant claims in the patient information sheet that Bio-Oss degrades slowly (resorbs) and that the Bio-Oss degrades by endogenous metabolic processes.

Evidence: Attachment K13 (see point b)

Because of the degradation and resorption and mentioned metabolism of Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide according to the information by the defendant the German Medicines Act (German drug law) is relevant.

For this issues the plaintiff sues at the District Court of Cologne and Higher Court against the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM -> Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte)

See the legal action and the statement by the Federal Court of Justice in Germany (Bundesgerichtshof) (→ if needed more ).

Evidence: Attachment K14

The defendant has the guilt that Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide were not approved as a medical drugs. The application and administration was and is carried out by the defendant illegally in Germany.

The medical modes of action are subject according to the defendant´s written statements (breakdown and resorption of both products), that means concretely that a metabolic mechanism or mode of action is a matter.

Insofar Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide are MEDICAL DRUGS and not medical devices.

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by a medical doctor and pharmaceutical academic -

However, there exist scientific studies (be submitted to the court, if necessary) that the Bio-Oss (bovine hydroxyapatite) does not degrade and does not resorb.

In the body of the plaintiff the Bio-Oss does not degrade and resorb and caused scientifically proven and medical confirmed incurable pain and inflammation.

Therefore the Bio-Oss from the defendant is not a bone substitute material or bone grafting material, because the Bio-Oss with remaining cow proteins does not degrade and is not replaced by bone. There exists no substitution in bone.

It is a wrong declaration by the defendant, which must be corrected immediately. The declaration must be useless, nonresorbable, pathogenic, bone-damaging, bone-destructing, cancer-causing bone filling material with remaining disease-causing protein of cows.

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by DZZI-Klinik, Dr. Axel Wirthmann (medical doctor and dentist), Berner Stieg 25, 22145 Hamburg -

Bio-Oss leads always to foreign body reactions and bone damage (sclerotic bone), when Bio-Oss is administered in the jaw bone for dental implants or other indications.

Approximately 25 percent of the implants have an inflammation in the soft tissue and bone (peri-implantitis). The reason for this is Bio-Oss because it is rejected by the human body.

- Scientifical study by Steiner Laboratories in the United States of America when required → there is no German translation now -

The defendant advertises that it is bone regeneration with Bio-Oss.

Exactly the opposite is the case, namely bone damage and dangerous side effects for patients like the plaintiff.

The patient lawyer Michael Zach, Volksgartenstraße 222a in 41065 Mönchengladbach fought in 2005 SUCCESSFULLY a court process with the amount of 5.000,- Euros for financial damages because of a missing patient enlightment concerning the administration of Bio-Oss by a dentist.

During a telephone call between the lawyer Michael Zach and the plaintiff in 2013 or 2012 he reported that he was still in contact with seriously damaged Bio-Oss victim and injured client.

The plaintiff asks for a contact through the court with Mr. Zach whether the Bio-Oss-victim is still living.

Mr. Zach told the plaintiff that the patient information sheet has been changed three times by the defendant since 2008, but it does not correspond with the truth.

Disability to work, seriously injured and ill Bio-Oss-victims fight partially over 10 years for any financial compensation at German courts without success.

The dentist Dr. Wolfgang Dirlewanger, Turmstr. 24 in 72202 Nagold is involved in a court process in Stuttgart according to a heavily damaged Bio-Oss-victim because he had overestimated his alleged healer syndrome.

Evidence: Attachment K15

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by Dr. Dirleanger at court -

Many dentists, Oral and Maxillofacial Suregons, ENT doctors and other medical doctors are and were confronted with seriously ill Bio-Oss victims.

Prof. Dr. Hans Behrbohm removed often unresorbable Bio-Oss in complicated operations in the jaws and sinuses or a tumor with Bio-Oss from the brain of a Bio-Oss damaged patient.

Evidence: Attachment K16

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by Prof. Dr. Hans Behrbohm (address above mentioned) at court -

Also the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Dr. Soost and Dr. Stiller made complicated surgeries for heavily injured Bio-Oss-victims to remove the unresorbable Bio-Oss.

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by Dr. Soost and Dr. Stiller (addresses above mentioned) at court -

To rehabilitate the Bio-Oss infected and contaminated plaintiff´s jaw and sinus and to remove surgically Bio-Oss  Dr. Soost, Dr. Stiller and Prof. Dr. Behrbohm made several surgeries for the plaintiff.

Due to these surgeries the plaintiff has irreversible Bio-Oss scars that cause also pain.

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by Dr. Soost, Dr. Stiller and Prof. Dr. Behrbohm at court -

In addition the plaintiff continues to lose teeth, all teeth are damaged, patially broken and caries exist. No German dentist wants to help the plaintiff.

A planned dental reconstruction should cost about 25.000,- Euros in 2012. The plaintiff wanted the medically necessary treatment.

However, the dentist Karin Michaelis refused shortly this medically necessary treatment.

The dentist Karin Michaelis discovered a cyst in the gum of the left upper jaw. Also she complained that the contaminated Bio-Oss gum in the left upper jaw of the plaintiff does not conform with a gum like healthy humans.

-  necessary requested report and expert opinion by Karin Michaelis, Gethsemanestr. 4, 10437 Berlin -

In addition the plaintiff continues to lose teeth, all teeth are damaged, partially broken and caries exist etc. The bite is wrong and as a result a malposition of the palintiff´s body (back, shoulder, neck...) has developed. The plaintiff is now an impotent cripple. There are several oral mucosa diseases that have been developed.

In the oral cavity are warts and possibly tumors etc. The left sinus and jaw is significantly damaged by Bio-Oss, the jawbone is extremely thin.  There is a huge hole in the area 26-24 because of Bio-Oss.

-  necessary requested report and expert opinion by a dentist at court - - necessary requested report and expert opinion by a orthopedist at court -

If Bio-Oss from the defendant spreads in the sinus, there will be serious consequences for example: chronic maxillary sinusitis like the plaintiff.

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by a human medical doctor at court (for example ENT or Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)

The unresorbable Bio-Oss particles can be transported in all possible areas of the body and cause diseases.

Evidence: Attachment K17

The pathologists Prof. Dr. Gattenlöhner, Dr. Dreyer and Prof. Dr. Löning were confronted with Bio-Oss cancer victims and findings with histological results in the sinus.

Evidence: Attachment K18

-  necessary requested report and expert opinion by Institute for Pathology, University Clinic Gießen & Marburg, Prof. Dr. Gattenlöhner and Dr. Dreyer, Langhansstr. 10 in 35385 Gießen and Institut for Pathology, Albertinen Hospital, Herr Prof. Löning, Fangdieckstr. 75a in 22547 Hamburg -

The defendant does not point out that there are significant and dangerous side effects by the administration of Bio-Oss.

Also the defendant does not mention for patients and users that the Bio-Oss is not allowed to spread in the sinus, what can lead to life-threatening side effects (see evidences).

For this reason the authorization as a medical drug is essential and necessary.

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by a human medical doctor -

The defendant claims that Bio-Oss can be administered for so-called sinus lifts / sinus floor elevations (bone grafting (bone building) in the human upper jaw), which is not true .

In addition the defendant performed and performs training events (for example with live surgeries) for sinus lift operations / sinus floor elevations by dentists and advertised and advertises that the dentists should administer Bio-Oss as an indication for sinus lift operations / sinus floor elevations.

Due to the missing human medical approbation (see again attachment K17) dentists are not allowed to practice sinus lifts / sinus floor elevation, because the volume of the maxillary sinus is reduced anatomically.

Certainly the sinus is a competence of the human medicine.

Oral and  Maxillofacial Surgeons have two approbations (dentistry and human medicine) and only those medical doctors can make sinus lifts (bone grafting in the upper jaw) legally.

Evidence: Attachment K17 (again)

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by a human medical doctor -

In this respect the defendant animated and animates dentists to bodily injury and assault, which is a matter of criminal offense.

The administration of Bio-Oss for sinus lifts / sinus floor elevations represents instruction errors by the defendant.

The plaintiff will submit many more issues for this legal action due to the financial claims of damage by the defendant.

The plaintiff requested his complete disability pension at the Public German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung).

Like several times for the GERMAN Employment Agency (Bundesagentur für Arbeit) or the private health insurance HUK-COBURG the plaintiff will have and must have by the GERMANS an examination for a medical report by the medical profession of psychiatry/neurology on 01/13/2015.

The appointment should include 3 to 4 hours. A questionnaire has been sent by the doctor (psychiatrist/neurologist).

Here the plaintiff must answer questions whether the plaintiff had fear of the darkness in his childhood or whether he ran away or whether he was a bed-wetter and such dehumanizing issues.

These questions are not relevant for the disability to work and his medical damage.

The facts do not apply and until today the plaintiff does not urinate in bed (By the way the plaintiff has no bed, because the GERMANS destroyed and expropriated everything of his life.).

In addition the plaintiff should give information about his sex life (which for over 5 years no longer exists).

In the FEDERAL REPUBLIC of GERMANY the plaintiff was, is and will be humbled and was, is and will be hurt deeply in his human dignity.

The plaintiff was years-long until 09/30/2011 an employe and an over average taxpayer, had a wonderful, happy and contented life and demands as soon as possible his compensation and claims for damages by the defendant in millions to receive medical care and a future perspective for a decent life in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or AUSTRALIA.

In Germany this will never be the case anymore.

Finally the plaintiff quotes an honest and good dentist, namely Dr. Alexander Zill , Hauptplatz 29 85276 Pfaffenhofen who the plaintiff consulted him for dental help too.

"If the good god would have the will that you have dead cow or salt crystals in your bulb, he would have found a non-surgical way to do it.

Cow bone taste great when one makes a soup from it. Any other use I do not see on the dental field at present.

If ever a bone grafting should be necessary (and I have doubts that the lateral side region in the upper jaws counts usually to it), then you should rely on your patient´s own bone.

But Germany is a free country: Who wants to have dead cow, that will get it.

All The Best"

- necessary requested report and expert opinion by the dentist Dr. Zill -

The claim: The applicant claims for the period from 01/10/2016 to 01/11/2016 damages at least in the amount of 4.999,99 Euros.

The GERMAN Klaus Louis Gerlach (retired).

LAWSUIT
ALEX INSTRUMENTS LTD.

- Plaintiff -

represented by the CEO Alex Schenker, Los Angeles, USA

against

University Prof. Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Klaus Louis Gerlach
University Clinic Magdeburg
Director Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Leipziger Str. 44
39120 Magdeburg
Germany

- Defendant -

provisional amount in dispute at least 4999,99 Euros

for financial damages caused by an erroneous court opinion respectively report for the Berlin District Court from 12/30/2012 and/or from 12/29/2012 (both dates were mentioned in the report) in the case court number 8 O 294/11 (Schenker ./. criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider) .

The plaintiff brings a legal action for financial claims caused by the defendant for all material and immaterial damages which the defendant caused by the erroneous court opinion respectively report for the period from 02/04/2016 to 02/05/2016.

Justification:

Born in Bielefeld on 03/09/1973 the plaintiff got on 06/06/008 by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider, Robert-Koch-Platz 11 in 10115 Berlin two dental implants in the left upper jaw regio 25 and 26, which had to be removed surgically on 10/23/2008 because of bad inflammation and severe pain (trigeminal neuralgia).

Since 06/06/2008 the plaintiff was and is in permanent medical treatments with almost unbearable jaw pain, inflammation, possibly malignant tumors in the oral cavity and other diseases.

Numerous follow-up surgeries at the left upper jaw, the left sinus and paranasal sinus, more than 300 syringes in the diseased jaw, all sorts of medications with antibiotics, painkillers upto morphine etc., acupunctures, manual therapies, physical therapies, alternative practitioners´ treatments could not mitigate and relieve the pain, inflammation and diseases caused by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider.

The criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider damaged knownly intentionally many patients like the plaintiff too, has been convicted already several times at courts, does not receive any professional liability insurance in Germany anymore and misuses the title "Doctor" in Germany although he has never earned his doctorate title or has written any thesis.

Now the criminal dentist Steffen Schneider is making a lightning career at an Austrian University for Dentistry in Vienna as a Medical Director and lecturer.

Even before 06/06/2008 the criminal Steffen Schneider damaged the plaintiff with causeless tooth extraction, with abrasion and blocking of the two front teeth, with a placed implant in February 2008, which had to be removed surgically in May 2008 due to massive, painful inflammations etc.

At the time unknowingly and without any enlightment about alternative treatments on 06/06/2908 the plaintiff was administered - by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider guilt - with the useless, indissoluble, disease-causing, cancer causing, misdeclared medical device "Bio-Oss" from farm animals -namely from cow with accordingly remaining cow proteins (prions) - and with the falsely declared, possibly disease-causing medical device "Bio-Gide" from pigs by the company Geistlich Pharma for two medical unnecessary bone reconstructions (bone graftings) in the left upper jaw (medical term sinuslift or sinus floor elevation) for two dental implants.

The plaintiff was damaged iatrogenically by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider severely and incurably.

On 08/08/2011 the plaintiff had to visit the psychiatrist / neurologist, Peter W. Lust from Berlin, because of his obligation to cooperate with his private health insurance HUK-COBURG for a medical opinion respectively report.

The plaintiff´s contract was cancelled by the HUK-COBURG extraordinarily on 09/05/2014 although the plaintiff needs urgently the coverage of benefits due to severe diseases and dental medically necessary treatments.

In this medical report (signed on 08/22/2011) the neurologist Lust confirmed on page 9 and 10 with "X" signalized that the plaintiff was damaged iatrogenically (insofar by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider) at his trigeminal nerve and with bovine (from origin cow) material (the name of the wrongly medical device "Bio-Oss" was not mentioned).

Additionally the neurologist Lust confirmed in his medical opinion/medical report: "Other causes can be ruled out with certainty."

Evidence: Attachment K1

In another medical doctors´ letter from 08/22/2012 by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Dr. Dr. Frank Soost and the ENT specialist Prof. Dr. med. Hans Behrbohm from Berlin confirmed both on page 1 with marked "X", that the plaintiff was iatrogenically (again by the criminal dentist Steffen Schneider) damaged with a chronic inflammation of the left jaw and the maxillary sinus and with a trigeminal neuralgia.

Furthermore both confirmed that the cause of the mentioned diseases is the construction plastic (that means Bio-Oss).

Evidence: Attachment K2

The pain of a trigeminal neuralgia is the most pain imaginable for a human being.

The plaintiff fought - represented by a lawyer - against the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider a legal action under the number 8 O 294/11 at the District Court Berlin to receive material and immaterial financial damages that was unsuccessful.

Even a juristic appeal to the next higher Regional Court Berlin was unsuccessful.

The defendant (Prof. Dr. Gerlach) has been chosen as a court expert by the District Court Berlin for a medical opinion respectively report and he wrote on papers very many pages (see medical opinion respectively report dated 29/10/2012 and / or 10/30/2012).

Evidence: Attachment K3

Because the defendant scribbled away with so much writing (what the plaintiff has to do also here), he demanded in the meantime even more money for his around writings by the plaintiff´s legal costs insurance and also from the plaintiff´s private health insurance HUK-COBURG which the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider sued and sues for the claims of damages.

The defendant should answer the question whether the plaintiff was treated by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider concerning the regular medical profession or whether medical malpractice occurred.

Finally the defendant made the conclusion that no rough medical malpractice and errors exist, what is definitely wrong.

The plaintiff did not want that all were out of the "Schneider" and therefore he contacted in 2012 by telefax and telephone the defendant´s assistant to enable a personal examination of the plaintiff by the defendant for a medical opinion respectively report.

Also the plaintiff´s private health insurance HUK-COBURG which sued the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider at the District Court Berlin and still sues wanted that the defendant perform a personal medical examination with the plaintiff.

However, the defendant decided against a personal visit by the plaintiff associated with a medical examination and created therefore the erroneous court opinion respectively report due to some medical files (the question is what files he had).

This decision by the defendant resulted in addition to further errors for the erroneous opinion respectively report.

Due to complete expropriation and destruction by Germans and German court decisions the plaintiff lost all his personal belongings of his life and and past.

Thus the plaintiff cannot hand out the relevant correspondence to this German court.

But the private health insurance HUK-COBURG has the correspondence related to the desired examination of the plaintiff by the defendant.

- if nessecary, demanded correspondence by the private health insurance HUK-COBURG -

So that dental implants can be stable and grow in the bone (osseointegration) a patient needs enough jaw bone.

The criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider practiced on 06/06/2008 two medical unnecessary sinuslifts with the useless and disease-causing (pathogenic), bovine (cow) bone grafting material "Bio-Oss" (some dentists call it rightly as devil stuff) and with the pig material "Bio-Gide" for the plaintiff.

The sinuslift is an invasive (tissue wounding) surgical procedure, which is used for bone augmentation in the upper jaw. Here the surgeon drills in the maxillary bone to gain access to the maxillary sinus membrane.

The maxillary sinus membrane represents the anatomical border to the sinus.

This sinus membrane (medical term: Schneiderian Membrane) is raised/is lifted - to the direction of the sinus - so that a cavity between the jaw bone and the maxillary sinus membrane is formed.

This cavity becomes filled with a material / a substance (augment), so that the bone is added in its quantity.
Due to this surgical procedure in the form of sinuslift the maxillary sinus is reduced by the surgeon anatomically.

The surgeon acts knownly that the anatomic situation of the sinus will be changed.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (like the defendant) are twice approved. It means concretely these medical doctors studied human medicine and dentistry. Insofar Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons are allowed to perform sinuslift surgeries.

The criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider studied (probably) dentistry with a received approbation (this must be withdrawn immediately). A human medical study with approbation is missing.

Because of the possibly dental study and approbation by the criminal (Dentist) Schneider he can practice all treatments that concern the oral cavity.

Diverse dentists and the physicians with the profession of human medicine confirmed to the plaintiff in the past only verbally, that the sinus is the competence of human medicine.

Because the plaintiff´s maxillary sinus volume was reduced anatomically due to the (failed) sinuslifts by the criminal dentist Schneider on 06/06/2008 it is definitely the matter of rough medical malpractices.

The concretely justification is that the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider did not have the necessary qualification with the approbation and study of human medicine.

Evidence: Attachment K4

The defendant wrote insofar an erroneous medical opinion / medical report for the District Court Berlin because he did not considered the limited dental medical issues concerning the oral cavity by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider.

With 100 percent certainty it was a non lege artis treatment performed (rough medical malpractice) because the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider (without necessary human medical approbation) reduced knownly the plaintiff´s volume of the maxillary sinus (which is definitely a belonging and competence of human medicine) anatomically.

The surgery on 06/06/2008 was a medical malpractice what the defendant did not represent in his court medical opinion /medical report.

- Demanded court expert report / expert opinion by a human medical physician, namely by a general practitioner → because of prejudice (conflict of interests) the plaintiff rejects the medical profession of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery -

On 06/07/2013 was the court hearing with the defendant (who arrived despite the high flood of the Elbe river), with the lawyer Stephanie Kollwitz, Lindenstr. 7 in 14467 Potsdam from the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider (the criminal Schneider was invited (a must of appearance!) to the court, but he could not arrive allegedly due to the flooding of the Danube river in Krems/Austria, what the "Chief Judge" accepted) with the plaintiff´s lawyer Sven Leistikow, Schaper Str. 14 in 10719 Berlin and the plaintiff at the District Court Berlin.

The plaintiff´s lawyer Leistikow asked the lawyer Kollwitz from the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider whether the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider has to carry sandbags for benefits and protection of the general public due to the flood of the Danube in Krems instead of the court appointment and court hearing.

The lawyer Kollwitz was silent and did not answer.

The plaintiff has doubts that the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider has ever carried a sandbag in his life. According to the view of the plaintiff the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider could appear to the appointment and court hearing at the District Court Berlin.

Because the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider did not arrive for the court proceeding at the Berlin District Court the date had to be changed (as previously very often) in the plaintiff´s opinion.

In 2012 the Berlin Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon PD Dr. Dr. Frank Dr. Soost (who treated the plaintiff and practiced surgeries yearslong) handed out the plaintiff´s patient files and patient records personally at the District Court Berlin and wanted to get a written confirmation by the District Court Berlin staff. This confirmation was refused according to the message by Dr. Soost to the plaintiff.

In the meantime documents disappeared at the District Court Berlin , such as these plaintiff´s patient files and patient records by Dr. Soost.
The Plaintiff does not know whether the defendant received those documents for the written medical court opinion / medical court report by the defendant.

The plaintiff doubted very much that the actions of the District Court Berlin as well as the actions for the next higher instance at the Higher Regional Court Berlin were made legally.

The plaintiff had to be represented by a lawyer because of the German right system at the District Court Berlin and the plaintiff wrote repeatedly papers with questions to the plaintiff´s lawyer Leistikow during the court hearing, that he asked and that had to be replied by the defendant.

Here the plaintiff let asked by his lawyer Leistikow the question for an answer by the defendant, whether the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider was allowed to perform sinuslift surgeries (which caused for the plaintiff irreversible inflammation and pain, diseases and disability for work etc. -> it is written confirmed by other doctors´ medical reports) with a missing approbation (approval as a medical doctor) for human medicine.

The defendant behaved extrem nervously during the whole court hearing and he avoided the reply and answer concerning the malpractices with the sinuslifts by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider.

Instead of replying to the question the defendant told stories that he even could make appendicitis operations with his human medical approval (approbation). However, these surgeries the defendant would not perform certainly as an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon.

In addition the lawyer Leistikow asked the defendant whether a dentist could perform surgeries from the oral cavity for the esophagus. The defendant remained silently and did not answer.

- if necessary, requested testimony by the lawyer Sven Leistikow -

The chief judge and friend from the lawyer Sven Leistikow (both sail together) not intervened and asked directly the defendant because of the malpractices (for example the performed sinuslifts) by the criminal Dentist Schneider, what had to be necessary and strigently requrired for a fair court hearing and court proceeding due to the plaintiff.

Moreover these issues have not been included in the written court protocol, which has to be questioned.

After § 839 a BGB (German civil law) the court expert (here medical opinion or report by the defendant) must pay the financial damages if he made intentionally or grossly negligent an incorrect court opinion respectively report that leads to (further) financial damages for one of the participants and he has to pay financial claims for these damages.

This situation applies in the case of the plaintiff against the defendant with absolute certainty.

The defendant did not answer regarding to the treatments and malpractices concerning to the sinuslift by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider and avoided the answers. That represents the offense of intention or at least an act of gross negligence.

In the written medical court opinion respectively report the defendant also did not regard the issue of rough errors and malpractices caused by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider. Therefore the defendant is obliged for the plaintiff´s financial compensation.

During the court hearing the defendant stated verbally and conclusively in regard to the useless, indissoluble (unresorbable), pathogenic, cancer-causing bone grafting material "Bio-Oss" from cows that he would reject it completely.

The defendant reported additionally during the court hearing that he would teach exclusively his students only bone augmentation (bone grafting -> bone regeneration) with the patients´ own (autologous) bone, which is considered to be the best and most natural material.

The survival rate of following placed implants is thereby significantly higher in comparison with the useless cow bone Bio-Oss and it is commonly known that Bio-Oss leads always to rejection and foreign body reactions.

According to the defendant´s verbal details synthetical bone grafting materials could be administered eventually, that resorb (dissolve) and turns (changes) and will be replaced in the patient' s own bone.

- if necessary, requested testimony by the lawyer Sven Leistikow and his “SAILING FRIEND”, The Chief Judge of District Court Berlin -

Surprisingly, also these verbal statements were not included in the written court record (protocol).

If the here mentioned facts should not be enough due to the absolutely "not lege artis" treatment (medical malpractices) by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider and claims for financial damages for the plaintiff, the plaintiff will sue against the defendant because of numerous other medical errors and malpractices by the criminal Dentist Schneider which the defendant only mentioned by the way or even did not mention in his written court opinion repspectively report.

For this purpose only a short summary: On 05/06/2008 (one day before the dilettante and wrong surgery by the criminal Dentist Schneider) the plaintiff let performed a so-called Digital Volume Tomography (CT scan) due to a request by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider.

This CT scan is a radiological examination where the bone and soft tissue of the jaw and sinus is recognized visually in 3 dimensions.

On 06/06/2008 the plaintiff had enough jaw bone to receive the two implants without any bone grafting surgeries (sinuslifts) by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider.

The defendant explained erroneously in his court opinion respectively report that only one of the two sinuslifts was medically unnecessary.
Because one surgical unnecessary sinuslift was performed by the criminal Dentist Schneider it is the matter of a statutory offence and criminal body injuring assault.

In 2010 the plaintiff visited the dentist and CEO of Champions Implants Dr. Armin Nedjat in Flonheim / Rhineland-Palatinate. Here analyzed Dr. Nedjat in detail the plaintiff´s Dental Cone Beam CT (CBCT scan) from 05/06/2008.

In a doctor's letter from the dentist Dr. Armin Nedjat and CEO of Champions Implants in 2010 he reported that for both implants in region 25 and 26 in the left upper jaw was enough bone and that the sinuslift surgeries were medical unnecessary.

Evidence: Attachment letter from 12/11/2010 by Dr. Nedjat

On page 12 in the defendant´s court medical opinion / report the defendant explained concerning the Dental Cone Beam scan (CBCT scan) from 05/06/2008 the following: "The bone defect in region 26 is also recognizable visually by the 3D model view with a few millimeters perforation in diamet."

After the word perforation the explanation "of the maxillary sinus mucosa/sinus membrane" or "Schneiderian Membrane" is missing.
On the Dental Cone Beam CT (CBCT scan) it can be seen that the maxillary sinus membrane (Schneiderian Membrane) has a perforation (holes / lacerations).

This premise is according to the literature and generally to dental medical doctrine an absolute contraindication for a planned sinuslift.
The sinuslifts were not allowed to be performed because of the damaged maxillary sinus membrane (Schneiderian Membrane), which represents a rough medical malpractice.

Insofar it was the statutory crime offence of bodily harm by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider.

The defendant did not go into this issue due to the non lege artis treatment in the opinion respectively report.

Unwittingly and always without enlightenment (like other Bio-Oss - damaged Steffen Schneider patients with accordingly judicial convictions) administered the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider the plaintiff on 06/06/2008 the bovine (cow) bone substitute material "Bio-Oss".

This useless, pathogenic, cancer-causing, indissoluble (unresorbable), misdeclared medical device from cows with remaining residual proteins (for example prions) damaged the plaintiff definitely.

People with disabilities and and people that cannot work anymore due to Bio-Oss sued and sue nationwide at German courts because of malpractices by the dental profession.

There are medical doctors who compare Bio-Oss with the thalidomide affair.

The plaintiff was sued by the manufacturer of Bio-Oss, namely the Swiss Geistlich Pharma AG, several times at German District Courts for its financial damages.

The Geistlich Pharma company has threatened that the plaintiff must go to jail.

Timely the plaintiff submitted on 12/31/2014 numerous legal actions against the German Geistlich Biomaterials distribution company at the District Court Baden-Baden regarding his financial claims for his damages.

Background is that instruction errors were and are present.

Also the Geistlich Pharma ignored and ignores the existing German Medicines Act (German medical drug laws).

The characteristics and qualities of the products Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide were and are described completely wrongly and are lies.

The company Geistlich Pharma is responsible for the plaintiff´s not more worthwhile life because of the German Products Liability Law and Producers Liability Law for the existing claims for financial damages.

- If necessary, legal actions against Geistlich Pharma -

The Bio-Oss is not allowed to spread into the sinus because of life-threatening side effects and chronic jaw infections like the plaintiff´s situation.

The defendant did not mention at all in his court opinion respectively report, that the plaintiff suffers with a chronic sinusitis which you cannot heal and that the plaintiff is ill.

About theses diseases of the plaintiff exist several medical writings.

The indissoluble Bio-Oss can be transported via the lymphatic vessels in the lungs, spleen etc. and eventually the human immune system gives up. For this purpose there is scientific literature.

Sometimes Bio-Oss spreads even in the brain and leads to tumor formation, which has been described already in the scientific literature.

Sometimes happen tumor formations in the paranasal sinuses by Bio-Oss, which many German pathologist (ergo the medical profession of human medicine) have documented already.

The defendant did not report the facts that Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide were declared wrongly by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte) as medical devices.

Definitely Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide are medical drugs, which must be approved and declared correctly, before the plaintiff was administered with these products by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider.

Again there were errors in the medical court opinion respectively report by the defendant.

The defendant described incorrectly in his report that the defect (perforation) of the Schneiderian Membrane before the sinsulifts on 06/06/2008, was much larger perforated during the surgery by the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider iatrogenically (even photos exist as documentation) and it could not be closed, so that the Bio- Oss was distributed in the sinus etc.

The criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider damaged the plaintiff intentionally, which constitutes the offense of assault and bodily injury.

The criminal Steffen Schneider needed the defendant as a test object - without regards to personal injury for the plaintiff on 06/06/2008 - for his industry event by the company Mectron (Piezosurgery) and the participating dentists.

The implantation surgery was planned with one hour time.

By almost countless medical malpractices the surgery time was three hours. The plaintiff was helpless and without being able to defend himself on the operating table.

Permanently new syringes were administered, it was drilled, hammered, the blood flowed down the plaintiff´s throat. It was an inhuman mistreatment - a slaughtering - for the plaintiff that was done in Germany without any intervention by the German prosecution.

The plaintiff compares the surgery with a rape by several German citizens. According this context the plaintiff currently have a process at the Social Court Berlin against the Federal State Gouvernment Berlin.

The plaintiff asked in diverse countries abroad for political asylum.
Another unknown dentist (?) made also - without the agreement by the plaintiff - any surgeries.

The plaintiff was three hours long helpless on the operating table and could not defend himself although he wanted to do it. He was delivered as a (human?) test object for the participating Germans (dentists ?).

Finally the plaintiff began to hyperventilate during the surgery...
Cold sweat ran in the plaintiff´s face during the operation, the body was completely soaked. Besides the criminal Dentist Steffen Schneider and two other German people (dentists ?) ca. 12 participants left the operating room during the surgery.

The plaintiff visited for medical help worldwide the dental profession and the human medical profession...

1994 the German government veterinarian Dr. Margit Herbst discovered BSE diseases of cows and reported this to the authorities with her civil courage.

Then her life was typically ruined psychologically and financially by the Federal Republic of Germany and Germans.

Finally Dr. Herbst should receive the Order of Merit by Germany and she refused it for understandable reasons of course.

A financial compensation for this unacceptable, cruel German actions Dr. Herbst did not get even after twenty years. Dr. Herbst fights further against the Germans and Germany.

Already in 1997 the World Health Organization (WHO) mentioned that bovine (cow) materials should be avoided in medicine because of BSE diseases.

The plaintiff lost his job on 30/09/2011 (court decision by the German medical concern PAUL HARTMANN AG -> "Hartmann helps healing." with dismissal because of illness from 09/02/2011, court desicion exists) and his private health insurance HUK-COBURG with the best possible benefits on 05/09/2014 extraordinarily, although the plaintiff needs medical treatments urgently → the plaintiff sued in the end of December 2014 the HUK-COBURG private health insurance at the German District Court Coburg.

The plaintiff lost his apartment and is homeless.

The Germans and Germany expropriated all private things (including his birth certificate) of the past from the plaintiff, humbled and humiliated the plaintiff profoundly and do not respect human rights.

The human dignity of the plaintiff was and is injured in an unimaginable way.

A legal action at the European Court for human rights violation by the Federal Republic of Germany is in preparation.

The plaintiff has been and is being sued by all kind of German people and German institutions.

Also the plaintiff sued and sues diverse German people and German institutions. Many German prosecutors made investigations against the defendant.

The plaintiff´s debts are now well over ?????????? - Euros.

The impotent, homeless, seriously ill, 41 years-old cripple as plaintiff without any prospects or future in Germany demands financial claims for damages including all consequential damages because of the erroneous court opinion respectively report by the German defendant.

So that he can receive necessary medical international treatments and finally to get a decent life with future and human rights -in contrast to Germany and Germans in the USA or Australia.

The plaintiff had for many years until September 2011 a contract with legal costs insurance by the GERMAN ALTE LEIPZIGER. Without a time gap then he had a legal costs insurance by the